Seventy-three million Americans (10 million more than last time!) voted for the president even after I plainly stated on this site weeks ago: For once the choice is not between greater and lesser evils. This time it’s black and white. Good versus evil.
How could they? Are they blind or demented?
Who let such people in our country? Where was the wall when we needed one? Where’s a basic intelligence poll test when we need one?
Please answer this question before I give you a ballot: Was John Brown sane or insane, saint or villain, liberator or terrorist?
And the answer is …?
Therein lies the problem. Who’s to say? Who would be right?
Every morning before I take on the news, I take up a book—biographies usually. Recently I read about the lives of three African Americans who migrated out of the lynching Jim Crow South in the early 20th century in The Warmth of Other Suns, by Isabel Wilkerson.
Currently, I’m reading John Brown, Abolitionist, by David Reynolds.
As it turns out, half the nation saw John Brown one way, the other half another way, just as our nation is divided in its perception of the president. Messiah or Mussolini?
No, the president is not John Brown. Brown conceded defeat graciously. Even Henry Wise, governor of Virginia, considered Brown a “true gentleman” (but still sent him to the gallows!).
There are, however, similarities between Brown and the president.
Each dominated national news for a long spell. Each forced the nation into polarized camps. Each has been deemed a tyrant and/or insane.
Pottawatomie John Brown of “Bleeding Kansas” led a murderous attack on Harpers Ferry, and still his Northern base supported him. Not all, but many. Thoreau, Emerson, and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow did.
Earlier, William Lloyd Garrison, a pacifist abolitionist, rebuked the extremely devout, Bible-waving, Calvinistic Brown for defying Christ’s commandment in the New Testament: Love your enemies. Brown replied: I’m an Old Testament Christian.
Abraham Lincoln also denounced Brown’s violence. Lincoln said persuasion would work better. And then Lincoln did what Brown did at Harpers Ferry. He invaded the South with armed forces.
The nation was bitterly divided. Each side touted different values. Each saw the other as enemy. Each claimed God was on its side.
I would never claim God is on our side.
I’m just glad our side is right.
See Paula’s “Sunrise on Bear’s Rocks, Dolly Sods” photograph on the home page.
It’s hard when people take sides, it usually ends up with some of them getting hurt. Why do all of them think they are right, which means the others are wrong. Probably all wars have started that way. You all remain in my thoughts and prayers. I am English, we also have problems and God is amongst us as well. Wherever I am God is and all is well. Love to you all, Alison.
THANK YOU for the historical insights… perspective – we HAVE been here before!
Choices…I cannot hate half of my neighbours; coworkers; family – and I hope they won’t hate us. Many are good, decent people…we stood in line, with masks on, to vote together. We have a long way to go. I’ll do what I can, each moment, each day…breathe…And I’ll pray for all of us, to make it through…together.??
I’ve often said that John Brown was a homicidal maniac who landed on the right side of an issue, abolition.
Foregoing loyalty requires recognition that one’s internal worldview is no longer accurately based, requiring change the 45th’s base is not ready to assimilate. Too frightening, too much dissonance. I agree that you are “right,” and I KNOW that Brown was wrong in his surest justification: John, there ARE no “Old Testament Christians.” Oops! Will say that slavery was the larger evil, however history judges Brown. I do not give the 45th similar quarter.
Love the historical perspective..takes me out of the ongoing “personal” misunderstanding of the other side..at least for the moment.
I have always believed that opposing forces are the same and not the same, and the tension between poles is the electricity of life itself. The Chinese character Wei Ji (danger/opportunity) comes to mind. If you were a god creating theatre (us), would not the energetic point on the stage be the most compelling and entertaining? The irony and paradox at this moment in time. Oh my.